In a significant legal development, a federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit against Resorts World Las Vegas and its former president, Scott Sibella. The case, brought by a former patron, alleged that the casino allowed known felons to gamble and subsequently directed another player to harass him after he reported these concerns to management.
Details of the Lawsuit
The lawsuit, filed by Robert “R.J.” Cipriani, a high-stakes gambler known on social media as RobinHood702, included six counts against the casino and its former executive. Cipriani claimed that Resorts World and Sibella were negligent in their operations and engaged in civil conspiracy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
- Key Allegations:
- Negligence: Cipriani argued that the casino failed to prevent known felons from gambling on the premises.
- Harassment: He alleged that after raising his concerns, management directed another player to intimidate him.
The case was filed last year and drew attention due to its serious allegations against a prominent Las Vegas casino.
Court’s Decision
On October 24, 2024, U.S. District Court Judge Miranda M. Du dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning that Cipriani cannot refile the case in the future. This ruling effectively ends the legal battle for Cipriani against Resorts World and Sibella.
The dismissal highlights the court’s stance on the claims made by Cipriani, suggesting that they did not meet the necessary legal standards to proceed.
Implications for Resorts World Las Vegas
The dismissal of this lawsuit is a relief for Resorts World Las Vegas, which has been operational since 2021 and is part of the Genting Group. The casino has positioned itself as a premier destination on the Las Vegas Strip, and this ruling allows it to continue focusing on its business without the distraction of ongoing litigation.
- Reputation Management: The casino can now work to maintain its reputation in a competitive market, free from the allegations raised in this lawsuit.
As the legal landscape continues to evolve, this case serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in the gaming industry and the challenges that casinos may face from patrons.
