Skip to content Skip to footer

Aussie Bookmaker VicBet Fined AU$130,000 for Customer Care Breaches

Online bookmaker VicBet has been slapped with a significant AU$130,000 (US$81,000) fine by the Victorian Gambling and Casino Control Commission (VGCCC) after being found guilty of two breaches of customer care obligations. The case has sparked a renewed focus on the responsibilities of gambling operators toward vulnerable customers.

Allegations of Serious Misconduct

VicBet’s troubles stem from two specific incidents reported by the VGCCC. In one instance, the bookmaker offered an AU$1,800 (US$1,120) bonus bet to a customer in September 2022, even after the individual had requested to close their betting account. Such an act is considered a direct violation of customer care standards in Victoria. Offering incentives to keep accounts open, the VGCCC has emphasized, undermines efforts to protect customers from potential gambling harm.

In a second breach, VicBet continued to send gambling promotional materials to a customer who had permanently self-excluded from the platform back in March 2020. This is a clear violation of the Victorian Bookmakers’ Association Code of Conduct, which prohibits contact with self-excluded individuals to safeguard their well-being.

VicBet logo and gambling regulation enforcement

The Legal Framework and Violations

The VGCCC outlined that under Victoria’s strict gambling regulations, bookmakers are prohibited from:

  • Offering credit, bonuses, or rewards to discourage account closure after a customer’s explicit request.
  • Sending any promotional communications to individuals who have self-excluded from gambling activities.

These rules are part of a broader effort to promote responsible gambling and protect individuals who may be at risk of gambling-related harm. Breaching these rules not only disregards individual autonomy but also raises ethical concerns about the tactics employed by some gambling operators.

Broader Implications for the Industry

This case highlights ongoing issues within the gambling industry regarding customer care and regulatory compliance. Gambling regulators worldwide have ramped up scrutiny on operators, focusing on areas such as self-exclusion enforcement and the marketing of promotional offers. The VGCCC’s decision to impose a hefty fine on VicBet serves as a stark warning to other operators who might consider ignoring their responsibilities.

A spokesperson for the VGCCC stated: “Operators must place customer well-being at the heart of their business practices. The consequences of failing to meet these obligations can be severe, as demonstrated by this case.”

The penalties also underscore the growing emphasis on accountability within the gambling sector, as regulators seek to address long-standing concerns about the effectiveness of self-exclusion measures and the influence of targeted marketing.

Public and Expert Reactions

Critics of the gambling industry have long argued that promotional tactics can exacerbate problem gambling. Advocacy groups have welcomed the VGCCC’s decision, stating it sets an important precedent for holding bookmakers accountable. However, some industry insiders worry that overly stringent regulations could drive customers to unregulated operators.

“Fines like these send a strong message,” said a gambling policy expert. “But they also reveal a systemic problem where companies prioritize profits over ethical practices. It’s essential that gambling companies not only follow the letter of the law but also embrace the spirit of responsible gambling.”

A Wake-Up Call for Other Operators?

This latest enforcement action raises pressing questions for other operators about their compliance processes:

  • Are their promotional strategies aligned with responsible gambling principles?
  • How robust are their mechanisms for enforcing self-exclusion requests?
  • Do they have effective training in place for staff to understand and implement customer care policies?

The VicBet case illustrates how non-compliance can lead to significant financial and reputational costs. It’s a stark reminder to operators that customer trust and regulatory adherence are non-negotiable in the long run.

Leave a comment