Skip to content Skip to footer

MGM and Allies Shell Out $755K to Block Tysons Casino Proposal

Opposition to a proposed casino in Tysons, Virginia, has spurred a spending spree by MGM Resorts International and other stakeholders, totaling over $755,000 in lobbying and political donations since early 2023. The hefty sum underscores the high stakes of casino politics in the Washington, D.C., suburbs.

MGM Resorts at the Forefront of Opposition

MGM Resorts International, the owner of the MGM National Harbor Hotel & Casino in nearby Maryland, has led efforts to keep a casino out of Tysons. Campaign finance reports reveal the company donated $40,750 to various political action committees and lawmakers’ campaign committees during the 2023–2024 period.

The intent is clear: protect its lucrative National Harbor property from potential competition across the Potomac River. By supporting lawmakers who oppose the Tysons casino, MGM aims to secure its dominant position in the regional gaming market.

But donations were just the tip of the iceberg. MGM also poured $222,367 into lobbying efforts during Virginia’s 2024 legislative session. Six lobbyists were retained and reimbursed by the gaming giant to advocate for its stance on the proposed casino legislation.

casino lobbying virginia

The Role of PLUS Communications and Shadow Groups

Adding to the opposition’s arsenal, Arlington-based PLUS Communications contributed significantly to the campaign against the Tysons casino. The public relations firm spent an eye-popping $492,780 to support two corporations established to oppose the casino and other gaming ventures, such as neighborhood slot machines often referred to as “skills games.”

The financial backing of these corporations remains opaque, but their goal is evident: influence public opinion and lawmakers to reject the Tysons casino proposal.

These efforts included grassroots campaigns, media outreach, and strategic alliances aimed at swaying lawmakers in Richmond. The combined lobbying and PR efforts paint a picture of a well-organized, well-funded opposition seeking to maintain the status quo in regional gaming.

Why Tysons Is a Battleground

Tysons, a bustling hub in Northern Virginia, represents an attractive location for a casino. Its proximity to Washington, D.C., affluent residents, and high traffic volume make it an enticing prospect for developers and a potential threat to established gaming facilities like MGM National Harbor.

The proposed casino is part of a broader push to expand gambling in Virginia. In recent years, the state has warmed to gaming, authorizing casinos in cities like Norfolk, Danville, and Portsmouth. However, extending this approval to Northern Virginia—an economically vibrant region—raises concerns about oversaturation in the regional gaming market.

Opponents argue that a Tysons casino would cannibalize revenues from existing venues, particularly in Maryland. Proponents counter that it would generate significant tax revenue for Virginia, create jobs, and boost the local economy.

The Numbers Behind Virginia’s Gaming Boom

Virginia’s embrace of casinos has already reshaped its gaming landscape. Here’s a quick look at the numbers:

Casino Location Projected Revenue (Annual) Jobs Created
Norfolk $500M 2,500
Danville $400M 2,000
Portsmouth $300M 1,500

While these figures demonstrate the potential economic benefits of casino expansion, the Tysons proposal faces unique challenges due to its proximity to Maryland and D.C. casinos.

Political Implications

The casino debate has drawn sharp lines among Virginia lawmakers. While some view it as an economic boon, others express concerns about its social impact and competition with existing gaming operations.

MGM’s lobbying and donation strategy highlights how influential corporate interests can shape legislative outcomes. Critics argue that such spending skews the political process, allowing deep-pocketed corporations to wield disproportionate influence.

On the flip side, proponents of the Tysons casino lament the lack of a level playing field. They accuse opponents of using financial clout to stifle competition and deny Virginia residents the economic benefits of a new casino.

Leave a comment