A proposal to raise the maximum bets and payouts for video poker in Montana, untouched since 1987, has sparked lively debate across the state. While some view the change as overdue, others fear its potential consequences.
The Details of Senate Bill 153
Senate Bill 153, introduced by State Sen. Wylie Galt (R-Martinsdale), proposes doubling the current maximum video poker bet from $2 to $4 and increasing the maximum payout per play from $800 to $1,199. The adjustment is strategically set just below the $1,200 mark, which would require a federal tax form (W-2G) for larger winnings. The bill would only apply to machines installed after 2026, giving businesses time to adapt.
The bipartisan support for the measure is notable. The bill’s sponsors include a mix of five Republicans and two Democrats, such as Speaker of the House Brandon Ler (R-Savage), signaling a rare cross-party alignment. However, this unity among lawmakers does not reflect the wider public opinion.
Arguments for Raising Limits
Supporters argue that the current limits, unchanged for decades, are outdated.
- Economic Boost: Proponents believe that higher bet and payout limits could encourage more gambling, potentially increasing revenue for local businesses and the state’s general fund. “It’s time to modernize our approach,” said one supporter during the hearing.
- Business Adaptation: As inflation raises costs for businesses, including those operating gambling machines, updated limits could help operators stay competitive. For many establishments, video gambling represents a significant portion of revenue.
- Consumer Choice: Advocates also emphasize personal freedom, saying players should have the option to wager more if they choose. “It’s about giving adults the ability to make their own decisions,” said a proponent at the hearing.
Concerns About Expanded Gambling
Not everyone is on board with the proposed changes. Critics worry about the social and economic effects of making gambling more accessible and potentially addictive.
- Gambling Addiction: Several groups have voiced concerns about the potential for increased gambling addiction. Higher stakes could exacerbate financial problems for those struggling with addiction.
- Community Impact: Some fear that the potential rise in gambling-related issues could strain local resources, from counselling services to law enforcement.
- Revenue Distribution: While the state may benefit from increased gambling revenue, critics argue that the broader social costs could outweigh the financial gains.
A representative from a local addiction recovery organization shared concerns during the hearing, saying, “We’ve seen the toll gambling can take on families. Raising the stakes doesn’t just increase winnings; it increases risks.”
Public Opinion: A Mixed Bag
Montanans remain split on the issue. Some see the change as a welcome update that aligns the state with evolving gambling trends nationwide. Others worry it could lead to increased financial hardship and exploitation of vulnerable communities.
Survey Highlights
- A recent informal poll by a local newspaper showed 45% support for the measure, 38% opposition, and 17% undecided.
- Among small business owners, opinions were similarly divided, with some welcoming the potential revenue boost and others wary of the associated risks.
Potential Timeline and Implementation
If passed, the new limits wouldn’t take effect until 2026. This phased implementation gives businesses time to replace older machines with updated models. Critics argue this timeline could create disparities between establishments operating older machines and those with newer ones, possibly disadvantaging smaller operators.
To address these concerns, lawmakers have proposed amendments, including financial support for small businesses to upgrade machines and stricter regulations on advertising higher stakes gambling.